![]()
Die Recherche erfolgte in den Datenbanken Medline, PsycINFO, LIVIVO, PubPsych, Scopus, Cinahl und CENTRAL.Įrgebnisse 30 Studien wurden in die qualitative Analyse eingeschlossen. Methodik Es wurde eine umfassende systematische Literaturrecherche zu der Forschungsfrage: „Welche evidenz-basierten Methoden eignen sich zur Beurteilung der Fahrtauglichkeit von Menschen mit Demenz (MmD) oder milden kognitiven Einschränkungen (MCI)?“ für den Zeitraum 2015–2020 durchgeführt. Moreover, there is a general understanding that the driver’s cognitive, manual, visual, and auditory resources are all involved, to a certain degree, when executing a secondary task while driving.Įinleitung Aufgrund der hohen Prävalenz demenzieller Erkrankungen handelt es sich bei der Überprüfung der Fahrtauglichkeit von Menschen mit kognitiven Beeinträchtigungen um ein Thema von großer gesellschaftlicher Relevanz. #Cognitive demand of undistracted highway driving drivers#The main findings revealed that TPWD distraction negatively affects driving performance, exposing drivers to dangerous traffic situations. A number of 4332 studies were identified in the database search, from which 83 were included in the review. It was focused on finding answers to three research questions that could offer an overview of the main sources of distraction, the research infrastructure, and the measures that were used to analyze and predict the effects of distractions. The search was performed on five databases, covering twenty years of research results. This work is a scoping review which followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. This research aimed to review relevant simulator-based studies focused on investigating the effects of the talking-on-the-phone-while-driving distraction on drivers’ behavior. Driving simulators provide excellent practical and theoretical help in studying the driving process, and considerable efforts have been made to prove their validity. Overall, the current findings indicate, for the first time, that a common driving practice, such as the use of mobile phone, may have a detrimental impact on the driving performance of individuals with MCI.ĭistracted driving is a growing concern around the world and has been the focus of many naturalistic and simulator-based studies. Notably, the aforementioned findings concerning the MCI patients in the case of the mobile phone were observed despite the effort of the drivers to apply a compensatory strategy by reducing significantly their speed in this driving condition. On the other hand, in the driving condition "conversing with passenger" the interaction effects regarding reaction time and accident probability were not significant. Specifically, the use of mobile phone induced a more pronounced impact on reaction time and accident probability in the group of patients, as compared to healthy controls. The mixed ANOVA models revealed a greater effect of distraction on MCI patients. #Cognitive demand of undistracted highway driving simulator#The driving simulator experiment included three distraction conditions: (a) undistracted driving, (b) conversing with passenger and (c) conversing through a hand-held mobile phone. Thirteen patients with MCI (age: 64.5☗.2) and 12 cognitively intact individuals (age: 60.0☗.7), all active drivers were introduced in the study. The main objective of the current study was to explore the effect of in-vehicle distraction on the driving performance of MCI patients, by assessing their reaction time at unexpected incidents and accident probability. Drivers with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), because of their attenuated cognitive resources, may be vulnerable to the effects of distraction however, previous relevant research is lacking. In-vehicle distraction is considered to be an important cause of road accidents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |